BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 220|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 220
          Author:   Corbett (D)
          Amended:  6/4/07
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  6-4, 4/18/07
          AYES:  Kuehl, Alquist, Cedillo, Ridley-Thomas, Steinberg,  
            Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad, Cox, Maldonado, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Negrete McLeod

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-6, 5/31/07
          AYES:  Torlakson, Cedillo, Corbett, Florez, Kuehl, Oropeza,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Steinberg, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Aanestad, Ashburn, Dutton, Runner, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Battin, Simitian


           SUBJECT  :    Vended water

           SOURCE  :     Clean Water Action
                      Consumer Federation of California
                      East Bay Municipal Utility District
                      Latino Issues Forum


           DIGEST  :    This bill modifies the definition of a  
          water-vending machine and adds to current requirements for  
          the maintenance and inspection of water-vending machines.   
          This bill authorizes the Department of Public Health to  
          charge a fee to recover costs associated with any action  
          taken to ensure correction of violations and compliance  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          2

          with this bill, raises the annual license fees of  
          water-vending machines from $10.50 to $40.  This bill  
          requires each bottled water plant, as a condition of  
          licensure, to annually prepare a consumer confidence report  
          in specified languages and requires specified information  
          to be included on each container of bottled water.

           ANALYSIS :    

          Existing federal law:

          1. Charges the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with   
             regulating bottled water as a food.  The Federal Food,  
             Drug, and Cosmetic Act  provides the FDA with broad  
             regulatory authority over food.

          2. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), sets the  
             framework for regulation of drinking water quality in  
             the United States by the Environmental Protection  
             Agency.  Under the SDWA, a state is authorized to assume  
             responsibility for managing the safety of its drinking  
             water quality if the state is certified as having a  
             program at least as stringent as, or more stringent  
             than, the federal program.  California has been given  
             that authority.

          Existing state law:

          1. Defines a "water-vending machine" as any self-service  
             device that, upon payment, dispenses a unit volume of  
             water to be used for drinking, culinary, or other  
             purposes involving a likelihood of the water being  
             ingested by humans.   

          2. Prescribes various quality and labeling standards for  
             both bottled and vended water, including mineral water,  
             and also limits the levels of certain contaminants that  
             may be contained in those water products.  

          3. Establishes a fee schedule for bottled and vended water  
             licenses, and sets the annual fee for water-vending  
             machines at $10.25.  Effective July 1, 2007,  
             responsibility for the administration of the  
             above-mentioned provisions will be transferred to the  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          3

             Department of Public Health (DPH).  

          4. Requires weights and measures sealers to inspect and  
             test packaged commodities and all commercially used  
             devices and to inspect the validity of transactions  
             derived from the use of such devices.  

          5. Requires bottled water, water-vending machines, and  
             containers provided by retail water facilities to  
             contain specified information and to be clearly labeled  
             in an easily readable format.  

          6. Requires that water-vending machines, retail water  
             facilities, and private water sources that sell water at  
             retail sites display prescribed information.

          7. Permits bottled water to be labeled "drinking water,"  
             notwithstanding the source or characteristics of the  
             water, only if it is processed pursuant to the FDA Good  
             Manufacturing Practices, and any other requirements  
             established by the Department of Health Services (DHS).   
             Any vended water and any water from a retail water  
             facility may be labeled "drinking water,"  
             notwithstanding the source or characteristics of the  
             water, only if it is processed pursuant to current state  
             law related to vending machines and any other  
             requirements established by DHS.  Effective July 1,  
             2007, responsibility for the administration of the  
             above-mentioned provisions will be transferred to DPH.  
          
          This bill:

          1. Deletes the current definition of a "water-vending  
             machine" and defines it instead as a water-connected  
             vending machine designed to dispense drinking water or  
             purified or other water products, and requires the  
             machine to be designed to reduce or remove turbidity,  
             off-tastes, and odors and to provide disinfection  
             treatment and processes for dissolved solids reduction  
             or removal.

          2. Requires bottled water plants, as a condition of  
             licensure, to annually prepare a consumer confidence  
             report (CCR), in accordance with the most current  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          4

             version of DPH's guidelines for public water suppliers,  
             titled "Preparing Your CALIFORNIA Drinking Water CCR,"  
             and requires plants to make that report available to  
             each customer. 

          3. Requires that the report be prepared in English,  
             Spanish, and in languages for each non-English-speaking  
             group other than Spanish that exceeds 10 percent of the  
             state's population. 

          4. Permits relevant information from the CCR or water  
             quality report prepared for that year by a public water  
             system to be used when bottled water comes from a  
             municipal source.

          5. Requires DPH to require that water-vending machines be  
             cleaned, serviced, and sanitized in accordance with the  
             manufacturer's specifications at least once every 31  
             days, and requires inspection records to be kept for  
             every visit made by either the operator or the  
             maintenance personnel.  

          6. Requires these records to show the date and time of the  
             visit, any tests performed, any maintenance performed,  
             and the signature or electronic signature of the  
             operator or maintenance personnel.  

          7. Requires the records to be kept by the owner of the  
             water-vending machine for a minimum of two years and to  
             be made available to DPH upon request.
           
          8. Requires a record of consumer complaints to be kept on  
             file with the owner of the water-vending machine for a  
             minimum of two years, and to be made available to DPH  
             upon request.

          9. Permits DPH, if it determines that there is a violation  
             of the above provisions, to either embargo the machine  
             or impose a fine. 

          10.Raises the annual license fees of water-vending machines  
             from $10.50 to $40 and clarifies that the duty to  
             display the decal indicating a license fee has been paid  
             is only after the decal has been received by the  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          5

             water-vending machine operator.

          11.Adds the following to the information that water-vending  
             machines, retail water facilities, and private water  
             sources that sell water at retail locations must display  
             in a position clearly visible to customers:

             A.    A sign or label indicating the date on which the  
                water-vending machine was last sanitized and serviced  
                by the operator or maintenance personnel.  

             B.    A notice to consumers listing the industry's  
                recommendations for the type and condition of  
                container suitable for use with the water-vending  
                machine.  

             C.    A valid decal or seal received from DPH indicating  
                that a license fee has been paid and a license issued  
                for the water-vending machine.

             D.    A toll-free telephone number or a local telephone  
                number within the area code in which the machine is  
                located.

          12.Requires the information displayed to be in English,  
             Spanish, and upon request.

          13.Provides that bottled water may be labeled "drinking  
             water" under specified circumstances and requires each  
             container of bottled water sold at retail or wholesale  
             in this state in a plastic beverage container to include  
             on its label all the following: 

             A.    The name and contact information for the bottler  
                or brand owner. 

             B.    The source of the bottled water. 

             C.    A California Water Quality Notice that contains  
                the following:     "For more information and to  
                obtain additional consumer information relating to  
                water quality, including a consumer confidence  
                report, contact (name of bottled water company) at  
                (telephone number or toll-free telephone number) and  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          6

                (at least one of the following: mailing address,  
                e-mail address, and bottled water company Internet  
                Web site address)." 

          14.Requires bottlers that distribute bottled or vended  
             water directly to consumers to provide a statement on  
             each billing statement that includes (a) a telephone  
             number and mailing address of the bottler or brand  
             owner, and (b) the means by which a consumer may obtain  
             consumer information relating to water quality,  
             including a CCR. 

          Existing law requires the department to require that each  
          water-vending machine, retail water treatment plant, water  
          hauler vehicle and facility, and private water source be  
          maintained in a clean and sanitary condition at all times.

          This bill, effective January 1, 2009, requires  
          water-vending machines to be cleaned and serviced at least  
          once every 31 days.  This bill also requires, as of January  
          1, 2009, that maintenance and complaint records be kept by  
          the owner for a minimum of two years and be made available  
          to the department upon request.  It requires, commencing  
          January 1, 2009, the department to conduct annual  
          inspections of not less than 20 percent of the licensed  
          water-vending machines in the state, as provided,  
          authorizes the department to embargo the machine or impose  
          a fine, or both, if a violation is found,  authorizes the  
          department to conduct re-inspections of licensed  
          water-vending machines as necessary to prevent repeated or  
          continuing violations, and requires the department to  
          assess a fee to cover the costs of performing a  
          re-inspection conducted within 12 months of the initial  
          inspection.

           FISCAL EFFECT :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                         Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions        2007-08    2008-09    2009-10    Fund  


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          7

          Vendor inspections (DPH)       $0        $142      
          $142General

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/5/07)

          Clean Water Action (co-source)
          Consumer Federation of California (co-source)
          East Bay Municipal Utility District (co-source)
          Latino Issues Forum (co-source)
          Association of California Water Agencies
          California League of Conservation Voters
          California Trout
          California Watershed Network
          Culligan
          Environment California
          Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
          Environmental Working Group
          Food & Water Watch
          Irvine Ranch Water District
          Learning Disabilities Association of California
          Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
          National Resources Defense Council
          Planning and Conservation League
          San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
          San Jerardo Cooperative, Inc.
          Santa Clara Water District
          Santa Rosa Water District
          Sierra Club California
          Sonoma County Water Agency

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  6/5/07)

          California Bottled Water Association
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Grocers Association
          International Bottled Water Association

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The East Bay Municipal Utility  
          District (EBMUD), the co-sponsor of this bill, writes that  
          bottled water quality information is not consistently made  
          available to consumers and that many vended water  
          facilities are not clearly labeled or regularly inspected.   
          EBMUD contends that this bill will provide improved  
          consumer protection so that consumers can make informed  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          8

          choices about the drinking water they consume.  The  
          Learning Disabilities Association of California writes that  
          this bill will ensure that purchasers of bottled and vended  
          water are getting a safer, toxic-free product and that  
          consumers have readable product information and phone  
          numbers to call if questions or problems arise.  The  
          Environmental Working Group (EWG) contends that consumers  
          pay 100 times more for vended water than for tap water and  
          even higher prices for bottled water, and they have a right  
          to know what is in this water.  EWG also writes that the  
          findings of their studies show that current laws governing  
          vended and bottled water are not properly enforced and that  
          this bill addresses this problem by setting up an  
          inspection program.  The Sierra Club of California and the  
          Natural Resources Defense Council write that the state  
          agency currently tasked with enforcing bottled and vended  
          water regulations exercise limited oversight.  They state  
          that, in the case of vended water, inspections are  
          conducted only when complaints are received and this puts  
          low-income communities, who rely on vended water as their  
          primary drinking water, at a disadvantage.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California Chamber of  
          Commerce writes that bottled water is regulated as a food  
          product under the FDA, which subjects the industry to  
          specific packaging, sanitation, and food processing laws  
          and that testing requirements, inspections and monitoring  
          rules are already in place.  The Chamber contends that  
          since their members market products nationally and  
          worldwide, it is more efficient to have national standards  
          rather than state-only requirements, which add costs to  
          products and complexities to distribution systems.  The  
          California Grocers Association (CGA) is concerned that the  
          requirements of this bill are unnecessary in light of  
          existing laws and regulations.  CGA states that federal law  
          already establishes maximum chemical contaminant levels and  
          state law already specifies labeling requirements.  CGA  
          further states that bottled water is considered a food  
          product under federal law and is subject to comprehensive  
          statutory and regulatory framework.  CGA contends that  
          given this food product status, it seems impractical to  
          change the state regulation, as bottled water will still be  
          subject to federal packaging, sanitation, and food  
          processing requirements.  The California Nevada Soft Drink  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 220
                                                                Page  
          9

          Association opposes this bill because existing state and  
          federal law(s) already provides for the licensure and  
          regulation of entities that produce bottled water, federal  
          law establishes requirements for maximum chemical  
          containment levels, and they fail to see the need for  
          distributing the kinds of information contained in the CCR.  
           The California Bottled Water Association writes that this  
          bill imposes added costs and regulations to the industry  
          but provides no greater consumer protections.


          CTW:mw  6/5/07   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****





























                                                           CONTINUED