BILL NUMBER:  AB 684
  VETOED	DATE: 10/11/2007




To the Members of the California State Assembly:

I am returning Assembly Bill 684 without my signature.

As I indicated last year, I appreciate and applaud the Legislature's
interest in actually expanding California's economy; however, I am
concerned about the impact of the particular type of expansion that
is being proposed.  I recognize and am proud of that fact that
California is a national and world leader in the production of
high-quality agricultural commodities. Our state has a rich
agricultural environment and we must strive to protect and promote
farming, ranching and agri-business in California, while preserving
natural resources and protecting consumers.

Given these facts, I would like to support the expansion of a new
agricultural commodity in this State.  Unfortunately, I am very
concerned that this bill would give legitimate growers a false sense
of security and a belief that production of "industrial hemp" is
somehow a legal activity under federal law.

Under federal law, all cannabis plants, regardless of variety or THC
content, are simply considered to be "marijuana", which is a
federally regulated controlled substance. Any person in the United
States that wishes to grow cannabis plants for any purpose, including
industrial purposes, must first obtain permission and register with
the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).  Failure to do so
would be a violation of federal law and could subject an individual
to criminal penalties.

In addition, California law enforcement has expressed concerns that
implementation of this measure could place a drain on their resources
and cause significant problems with drug enforcement activities.
This is troubling given the needs in this state for the eradication
and prevention of drug production.

For these reasons, I am unable to sign this bill.

Sincerely,



Arnold Schwarzenegger