BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 23
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 23 (Ma)
          As Amended  January 16, 2008
          Majority vote 

           TRANSPORTATION      11-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Nava, Carter, DeSaulnier, |     |                          |
          |     |Garrick, Horton, Houston, |     |                          |
          |     |Karnette, Portantino,     |     |                          |
          |     |Ruskin, Solorio, Davis    |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Allows the City of San Francisco (City) to use an  
          automated enforcement system to enforce the prohibition of an  
          illegal right turn at the intersection of Market Street and  
          Octavia Boulevard.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Authorizes the use of automated enforcement systems (i.e., red  
            light cameras) at railroad crossings and intersections to  
            record violations of unlawful grade crossings and running of  
            red lights, respectively.  The law authorizes local agencies  
            to equip, install, and use the systems to photograph drivers  
            violating the grade crossing barriers and red lights after  
            certain public notification procedures and in accordance with  
            comprehensive requirements.  These requirements include  
            equipment calibration, operation, and maintenance, citation  
            administration and processing, due process and citation  
            challenge provisions, and restrictions on contracts with firms  
            providing the equipment and their related compensation.

          2)Authorizes, pursuant to SB 1802 (Rosenthal) Chapter 1216,  
            Statutes of 1994, the use of red light cameras to record  
            violations occurring at rail crossing signals and gates.   
            Authorizes, pursuant to SB 833 (Kopp) Chapter 922, Statutes of  
            1995, a three-year demonstration period to test the use and  
            effectiveness of such cameras to reduce the incidence of  
            drivers running red lights at roadway intersections and to  
            identify the drivers committing such violations and the  
            vehicles involved.  After reviewing the operations and  








                                                                  AB 23
                                                                  Page  2


            effectiveness of the pilot program, the Legislature enacted SB  
            1136 (Kopp) Chapter 54, Statutes of 1998, which authorizes the  
            use of automated enforcement systems at intersections  
            indefinitely.

          3)Refines, pursuant to AB 1022 (Oropeza) Chapter 511, Statutes  
            of 2003, the red light camera provisions after a number of  
            legal challenges arose to aspects of the red light camera  
            systems operation.  These changes clarified responsibility for  
            operation and maintenance of the system by local authorities  
            versus contractors, the involvement of law enforcement  
            personnel in citation issuance, restrictions on compensation  
            to vendors, and the required consideration of alternative  
            methods of enforcement.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, this bill intends to provide  
          the City with the explicit authority to automatically enforce an  
          illegal right turn violation at the intersection of Market  
          Street and Octavia Boulevard.  

          The author points out that the Market Street and Octavia  
          Boulevard intersection is one of the most dangerous traffic  
          spots for cyclists in the City, since automotive traffic  
          routinely makes illegal right turns off Market Street to access  
          the Highway 101 freeway ramp.  From 2002-2006, this intersection  
          was ranked among the top five locations with the highest  
          incidents of automobile and bicycle collisions in the City.   
          According to the sponsor, in 2005, there were 13 collisions  
          involving automobiles and bicyclists at this intersection, as  
          compared to an average of three collisions at various  
          intersections throughout the City.  

          Last year, an incident at the Market and Octavia intersection  
          involving cyclist Margaret Timbrell resulted in tragic  
          consequences.  Ms. Timbrell was struck by a motorist making an  
          illegal right turn from Market Street onto the freeway ramp.   
          She survived the collision but sustained 24 broken bones  
          throughout her body, a collapsed lung, and fluid in her chest  
          cavity.  Ms. Timbrell is only one of several cyclists who have  
          been hit at that intersection.  

          Committee comments:  Existing law provides authority for  








                                                                  AB 23
                                                                  Page  3


          automated enforcement at places where a driver is required to  
          respond to an official traffic control signal.  Existing law  
          does not identify specific violations for which automated  
          enforcement can be used but implies that automated enforcement  
          is intended for red-light violations.  

          Because of this ambiguity, it is unclear if current statute  
          already allows for the automated enforcement of illegal right  
          turns where the intersection is regulated by an official traffic  
          control signal.  

          Related legislation:  SB 1300 (Kuehl) of 2006, would have  
          authorized the City of Beverly Hills to use a mobile photo radar  
          enforcement system for local speed enforcement under specified  
          conditions until January 1, 2011.  That bill failed passage in  
          the Senate Housing and Transportation Committee.  

          SB 466 (Kuehl) of 2005, would have authorized the City of  
          Beverly Hills to use a mobile photo radar enforcement system for  
          local speed enforcement under specified conditions until January  
          1, 2010.  That bill was not heard in committee.  
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Alejandro Esparza / TRANS. / (916)  
          319-2093 


                                                                FN: 0003816