BILL NUMBER: SB 1667	CHAPTERED
	BILL TEXT

	CHAPTER  389
	FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE  SEPTEMBER 22, 2006
	APPROVED BY GOVERNOR  SEPTEMBER 22, 2006
	PASSED THE SENATE  AUGUST 28, 2006
	PASSED THE ASSEMBLY  AUGUST 23, 2006
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  AUGUST 21, 2006
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  AUGUST 14, 2006
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  JUNE 26, 2006
	AMENDED IN SENATE  MARCH 29, 2006

INTRODUCED BY   Senator Kuehl

                        FEBRUARY 24, 2006

   An act to amend Sections 295 and 366.21 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code, relating to dependent children.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   SB 1667, Kuehl  Dependent children.
   Existing law authorizes the juvenile court to adjudge a minor who
has been abused or neglected, or who meets other specified criteria,
to be a dependent child of the court. Existing law requires a social
worker or probation officer to give notice of review hearings
relating to the adoption or legal guardianship of the minor to
specified persons. Among others, the social worker or probation
officer is required to give notice to the foster parents, Indian
custodian, relative caregivers, community care facilitator or foster
family agency having physical custody of the child, if a child is
removed from the physical custody of the parents or legal guardian.
   This bill would authorize any foster parent, Indian custodian,
relative caregiver, community care facilitator, or foster family
agency who is notified, as described above, to attend all hearings
and to submit any information he or she deems relevant to the court
in writing.
   Existing law specifies the procedure for conducting hearings to
determine the status of a dependent child of the juvenile court,
including notice requirements and report filing deadlines. Existing
law requires a social worker, in specific circumstances, to file a
summary of his or her recommendations with the juvenile court at
least 10 days prior to the hearing. Existing law further requires a
social worker, at least 10 days prior to a status hearing, to file a
summary of his or her recommendations for disposition to a child's
foster parents, relative caregivers, or foster parents approved for
adoption, if the child is removed from the physical custody of his or
her parent prior to the hearing.
   This bill also would require a social worker to include with his
or her summary of recommendations a copy of the Judicial Council
Caregiver Information Form, in the caregiver's primary language when
available, along with instructions on how to file the form with the
court. By requiring social workers to perform additional duties, this
bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
   Existing law authorizes a foster parent, relative caregiver, or
certified foster parent, as defined, prior to any hearing involving a
child over whom he or she has custody, to file with the juvenile
court a report containing his or her recommendation for disposition.

   This bill would authorize a foster parent, relative caregiver, or
certified foster parent, in the alternative, to use a Judicial
Council Caregiver Information Form containing his or her
recommendation.
   This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 295 of
the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by SB 678 to become
operative only if this bill and SB 678 are enacted and become
operative on or before January 1, 2007, and this bill is enacted
last, in which case Section 295 of the Welfare and Institutions Code,
as amended by SB 678, shall remain operative only until the
operative date of this bill.
   This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 366.21
of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1774 to become
operative only if this bill and AB 1774 are enacted and become
effective on or before January 1, 2007, and this bill is enacted
last, in which case Section 366.21 of the Welfare and Institutions
Code, as amended by AB 1774, shall remain operative only until the
operative date of this bill.
  The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
   This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates
determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these
statutory provisions.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


  SECTION 1.  Section 295 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
   295.  The social worker or probation officer shall give notice of
review hearings held pursuant to Section 366.3 in the following
manner:
   (a) Notice of the hearing shall be given to the following persons:

   (1) The mother.
   (2) The presumed father.
   (3) The legal guardian or guardians.
   (4) The child, if the child is 10 years of age or older.
   (5) Any known sibling of the child who is the subject of the
hearing if that sibling either is the subject of a dependency
proceeding or has been adjudged to be a dependent child of the
juvenile court. If the sibling is 10 years of age or older, the
sibling, the sibling's caregiver, and the sibling's attorney. If the
sibling is under 10 years of age, the sibling's caregiver and the
sibling's attorney. However, notice is not required to be given to
any sibling whose matter is calendared in the same court on the same
day.
   (6) The foster parents, Indian custodian, relative caregivers,
community care facility, or foster family agency having physical
custody of the child if a child is removed from the physical custody
of the parents or legal guardian.  The person notified may attend all
hearings and may submit any information he or she deems relevant to
the court in writing.
   (7) The attorney of record if that attorney of record was not
present at the time that the hearing was set by the court.
   (8) The alleged father or fathers, but only if the recommendation
is to set a new hearing pursuant to Section 366.26.
   (9) If the court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child
is involved, then to the Indian custodian and the tribe of that
child. If the identity or location of the parent or Indian custodian
and the tribe cannot be determined, notice shall be given to the
Bureau of Indian Affairs.
   (b) No notice is required for a parent whose parental rights have
been terminated.
   (c) The notice of the review hearing shall be served no earlier
than 30 days, nor later than 15 days, before the hearing. In the case
of an Indian child, if notice is given to the Bureau of Indian
Affairs, the bureau shall have 15 days after receipt to provide the
requisite notice to the parent or Indian custodian and the tribe.
   (d) (1) The notice of the review hearing shall contain a statement
regarding the nature of the hearing to be held, any recommended
change in the custody or status of the child, and any recommendation
that the court set a new hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 in order
to select a more permanent plan.
   (2) In the case of an Indian child, the notice shall contain a
statement that the parent or Indian custodian and the tribe have a
right to intervene at any point in the proceedings. The notice shall
also include a statement that the parent or Indian custodian and the
tribe shall, upon request, be granted up to 20 additional days to
prepare for the proceedings.
   (e) Service of notice shall be by first-class mail addressed to
the last known address of the person to be provided notice. In the
case of an Indian child, notice shall be by registered mail, return
receipt requested.
   (f) If the child is ordered into a permanent plan of legal
guardianship, and subsequently a petition to terminate or modify the
guardianship is filed, the probation officer or social worker shall
serve notice of the petition not less than 15 court days prior to the
hearing on all persons listed in subdivision (a) and on the court
that established legal guardianship if it is in another county.
  SEC. 1.5.  Section 295 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
   295.  The social worker or probation officer shall give notice of
review hearings held pursuant to Section 366.3 in the following
manner:
   (a) Notice of the hearing shall be given to the following persons:

   (1) The mother.
   (2) The presumed father.
   (3) The legal guardian or guardians.
   (4) The child, if the child is 10 years of age or older.
   (5) Any known sibling of the child who is the subject of the
hearing if that sibling either is the subject of a dependency
proceeding or has been adjudged to be a dependent child of the
juvenile court. If the sibling is 10 years of age or older, the
sibling, the sibling's caregiver, and the sibling's attorney. If the
sibling is under 10 years of age, the sibling's caregiver and the
sibling's attorney. However, notice is not required to be given to
any sibling whose matter is calendared in the same court on the same
day.
   (6) The foster parents, relative caregivers, community care
facility, or foster family agency having physical custody of the
child if a child is removed from the physical custody of the parents
or legal guardian. The person notified may attend all hearings and
may submit any information he or she deems relevant to the court in
writing.
   (7) The attorney of record if that attorney of record was not
present at the time that the hearing was set by the court.
   (8) The alleged father or fathers, but only if the recommendation
is to set a new hearing pursuant to Section 366.26.
   (b) No notice is required for a parent whose parental rights have
been terminated.
   (c) The notice of the review hearing shall be served no earlier
than 30 days, nor later than 15 days, before the hearing.
   (d)  The notice of the review hearing shall contain a statement
regarding the nature of the hearing to be held, any recommended
change in the custody or status of the child, and any recommendation
that the court set a new hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 in order
to select a more permanent plan.
   (e) Service of notice shall be by first-class mail addressed to
the last known address of the person to be provided notice. In the
case of an Indian child, notice shall be by registered mail, return
receipt requested.
   (f) If the child is ordered into a permanent plan of legal
guardianship, and subsequently a petition to terminate or modify the
guardianship is filed, the probation officer or social worker shall
serve notice of the petition not less than 15 court days prior to the
hearing on all persons listed in subdivision (a) and on the court
that established legal guardianship if it is in another county.
   (g) If the social worker or probation officer knows or has reason
to know that an Indian child is involved, notice shall be given in
accordance with Section 224.2.
  SEC. 2.  Section 366.21 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
amended to read:
   366.21.  (a) Every hearing conducted by the juvenile court
reviewing the status of a dependent child shall be placed on the
appearance calendar. The court shall advise all persons present at
the hearing of the date of the future hearing and of their right to
be present and represented by counsel.
   (b) Except as provided in Sections 294 and 295, notice of the
hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 293.
   (c) At least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing, the social
worker shall file a supplemental report with the court regarding the
services provided or offered to the parent or legal guardian to
enable him or her to assume custody and the efforts made to achieve
legal permanence for the child if efforts to reunify fail, including,
but not limited to, efforts to maintain relationships between a
child who is 10 years of age or older and has been in out-of-home
placement for six months or longer and individuals who are important
to the child, consistent with the child's best interests; the
progress made; and, where relevant, the prognosis for return of the
child to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian;
and shall make his or her recommendation for disposition. If the
child is a member of a sibling group described in paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, the report and recommendation may
also take into account those factors described in subdivision (e)
relating to the child's sibling group. If the recommendation is not
to return the child to a parent or legal guardian, the report shall
specify why the return of the child would be detrimental to the
child. The social worker shall provide the parent or legal guardian,
counsel for the child, and any court-appointed child advocate with a
copy of the report, including his or her recommendation for
disposition, at least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing. In the
case of a child removed from the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian, the social worker shall, at least 10
calendar days prior to the hearing, provide a summary of his or her
recommendation for disposition to any foster parents, relative
caregivers, and certified foster parents who have been approved for
adoption by the State Department of Social Services when it is acting
as an adoption agency in counties that are not served by a county
adoption agency or by a licensed county adoption agency, community
care facility, or foster family agency having the physical custody of
the child. The social worker shall include a copy of the Judicial
Council Caregiver Information Form (JV-290) with the summary of
recommendations to the child's foster parents, relative caregivers,
or foster parents approved for adoption, in the caregiver's primary
language when available, along with information on how to file the
form with the court.
   (d) Prior to any hearing involving a child in the physical custody
of a community care facility or a foster family agency that may
result in the return of the child to the physical custody of his or
her parent or legal guardian, or in adoption or the creation of a
legal guardianship, the facility or agency shall file with the court
a report containing its recommendation for disposition. Prior to the
hearing involving a child in the physical custody of a foster parent,
a relative caregiver, or a certified foster parent who has been
approved for adoption by the State Department of Social Services when
it is acting as an adoption agency or by a licensed adoption agency,
the foster parent, relative caregiver, or the certified foster
parent who has been approved for adoption by the State Department of
Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency in counties
that are not served by a county adoption agency or by a licensed
county adoption agency, may file with the court a report, or a
Judicial Council Caregiver Information Form (JV-290), containing his
or her recommendation for disposition. The court shall consider the
report and recommendation filed pursuant to this subdivision prior to
determining any disposition.
   (e) At the review hearing held six months after the initial
dispositional hearing, the court shall order the return of the child
to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless
the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return
of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment. The failure of the parent
or legal guardian to participate regularly and make substantive
progress in court-ordered treatment programs shall be prima facie
evidence that return would be detrimental. In making its
determination, the court shall review and consider the social worker'
s report and recommendations and the report and recommendations of
any child advocate appointed pursuant to Section 356.5; and shall
consider the efforts or progress, or both, demonstrated by the parent
or legal guardian and the extent to which he or she availed himself
or herself to services provided.
   Whether or not the child is returned to a parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
conclusion that the return would be detrimental or would not be
detrimental. The court also shall make appropriate findings pursuant
to subdivision (a) of Section 366; and, where relevant, shall order
any additional services reasonably believed to facilitate the return
of the child to the custody of his or her parent or legal guardian.
The court shall also inform the parent or legal guardian that if the
child cannot be returned home by the 12-month permanency hearing, a
proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted. This section
does not apply in a case where, pursuant to Section 361.5, the court
has ordered that reunification services shall not be provided.
   If the child was under the age of three years on the date of the
initial removal, or is a member of a sibling group described in
paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, and the court
finds by clear and convincing evidence that the parent failed to
participate regularly and make substantive progress in a
court-ordered treatment plan, the court may schedule a hearing
pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. If, however, the court
finds there is a substantial probability that the child, who was
under the age of three years on the date of initial removal or is a
member of a sibling group described in paragraph (3) of subdivision
(a) of Section 361.5, may be returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian within six months or that reasonable services have not been
provided, the court shall continue the case to the 12-month
permanency hearing.
   For the purpose of placing and maintaining a sibling group
together in a permanent home, the court, in making its determination
to schedule a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 for some or all
members of a sibling group, as described in paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, shall review and consider the
social worker's report and recommendations. Factors the report shall
address, and the court shall consider, may include, but need not be
limited to, whether the sibling group was removed from parental care
as a group, the closeness and strength of the sibling bond, the ages
of the siblings, the appropriateness of maintaining the sibling group
together, the detriment to the child if sibling ties are not
maintained, the likelihood of finding a permanent home for the
sibling group, whether the sibling group is currently placed together
in a preadoptive home or has a concurrent plan goal of legal
permanency in the same home, the wishes of each child whose age and
physical and emotional condition permits a meaningful response, and
the best interest of each child in the sibling group. The court shall
specify the factual basis for its finding that it is in the best
interest of each child to schedule a hearing pursuant to Section
366.26 in 120 days for some or all of the members of the sibling
group.
   If the child was removed initially under subdivision (g) of
Section 300 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that
the whereabouts of the parent are still unknown, or the parent has
failed to contact and visit the child, the court may schedule a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. If the court
finds by clear and convincing evidence that the parent has been
convicted of a felony indicating parental unfitness, the court may
schedule a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days.
   If the child had been placed under court supervision with a
previously noncustodial parent pursuant to Section 361.2, the court
shall determine whether supervision is still necessary. The court may
terminate supervision and transfer permanent custody to that parent,
as provided for by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section
361.2.
   In all other cases, the court shall direct that any reunification
services previously ordered shall continue to be offered to the
parent or legal guardian pursuant to the time periods set forth in
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, provided that the court may modify
the terms and conditions of those services.
   If the child is not returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall determine whether reasonable services that
were designed to aid the parent or legal guardian in overcoming the
problems that led to the initial removal and the continued custody of
the child have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian. The court shall order that those services be initiated,
continued, or terminated.
   (f) The permanency hearing shall be held no later than 12 months
after the date the child entered foster care, as that date is
determined pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 361.5. At the
permanency hearing, the court shall determine the permanent plan for
the child, which shall include a determination of whether the child
will be returned to the child's home and, if so, when, within the
time limits of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5. The court shall
order the return of the child to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian unless the court finds, by a preponderance
of the evidence, that the return of the child to his or her parent or
legal guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to the
safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child.
The social worker shall have the burden of establishing that
detriment. The court shall also determine whether reasonable services
that were designed to aid the parent or legal guardian to overcome
the problems that led to the initial removal and continued custody of
the child have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian. For each youth 16 years of age and older, the court shall
also determine whether services have been made available to assist
him or her in making the transition from foster care to independent
living. The failure of the parent or legal guardian to participate
regularly and make substantive progress in court-ordered treatment
programs shall be prima facie evidence that return would be
detrimental. In making its determination, the court shall review and
consider the social worker's report and recommendations and the
report and recommendations of any child advocate appointed pursuant
to Section 356.5, shall consider the efforts or progress, or both,
demonstrated by the parent or legal guardian and the extent to which
he or she availed himself or herself of services provided, and shall
make appropriate findings pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366.

   Whether or not the child is returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian,
the court shall specify the factual basis for its conclusion that
the return would be detrimental. The court also shall make a finding
pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366.
   (g) If the time period in which the court-ordered services were
provided has met or exceeded the time period set forth in paragraph
(1), (2), or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, as appropriate,
and a child is not returned to the custody of a parent or legal
guardian at the permanency hearing held pursuant to subdivision (f),
the court shall do one of the following:
   (1) Continue the case for up to six months for a permanency review
hearing, provided that the hearing shall occur within 18 months of
the date the child was originally taken from the physical custody of
his or her parent or legal guardian. The court shall continue the
case only if it finds that there is a substantial probability that
the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the
extended period of time or that reasonable services have not been
provided to the parent or legal guardian.  For the purposes of this
section, in order to find a substantial probability that the child
will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or
legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the extended
period of time, the court shall be required to find all of the
following:
   (A) That the parent or legal guardian has consistently and
regularly contacted and visited with the child.
   (B) That the parent or legal guardian has made significant
progress in resolving problems that led to the child's removal from
the home.
   (C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity and
ability both to complete the objectives of his or her treatment plan
and to provide for the child's safety, protection, physical and
emotional well-being, and special needs.
   For purposes of this subdivision, the court's decision to continue
the case based on a finding or substantial probability that the
child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent
or legal guardian is a compelling reason for determining that a
hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not in the best interests
of the child.
   The court shall inform the parent or legal guardian that if the
child cannot be returned home by the next permanency review hearing,
a proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted. The court
may not order that a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 be held
unless there is clear and convincing evidence that reasonable
services have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian.
   (2) Order that a hearing be held within 120 days, pursuant to
Section 366.26, but only if the court does not continue the case to
the permanency planning review hearing and there is clear and
convincing evidence that reasonable services have been provided or
offered to the parents or legal guardians.
   (3) Order that the child remain in long-term foster care, but only
if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence, based upon the
evidence already presented to it, including a recommendation by the
State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency in counties that are not served by a county adoption agency or
by a licensed county adoption agency, that there is a compelling
reason for determining that a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26
is not in the best interest of the child because the child is not a
proper subject for adoption and has no one willing to accept legal
guardianship. For purposes of this section, a recommendation by the
State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency in counties that are not served by a county adoption agency or
by a licensed county adoption agency that adoption is not in the
best interest of the child shall constitute a compelling reason for
the court's determination. That recommendation shall be based on the
present circumstances of the child and may not preclude a different
recommendation at a later date if the child's circumstances change.
   If the court orders that a child who is 10 years of age or older
remain in long-term foster care, the court shall determine whether
the agency has made reasonable efforts to maintain the child's
relationships with individuals other than the child's siblings who
are important to the child, consistent with the child's best
interests, and may make any appropriate order to ensure that those
relationships are maintained.
   (h) In any case in which the court orders that a hearing pursuant
to Section 366.26 shall be held, it shall also order the termination
of reunification services to the parent or legal guardian. The court
shall continue to permit the parent or legal guardian to visit the
child pending the hearing unless it finds that visitation would be
detrimental to the child. The court shall make any other appropriate
orders to enable the child to maintain relationships with
individuals, other than the child's siblings, who are important to
the child, consistent with the child's best interests.
   (i) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to Section
366.26 shall be held, it shall direct the agency supervising the
child and the licensed county adoption agency, or the State
Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency
in counties that are not served by a county adoption agency, to
prepare an assessment that shall include:
   (1) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents or
legal guardians.
   (2) A review of the amount of and nature of any contact between
the child and his or her parents or legal guardians and other members
of his or her extended family since the time of placement. Although
the extended family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case
basis, "extended family" for the purpose of this paragraph shall
include, but not be limited to, the child's siblings, grandparents,
aunts, and uncles.
   (3) An evaluation of the child's medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.
   (4) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment of
any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse or
neglect, the capability to meet the child's needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed guardian is a relative of
the minor, and the relative was assessed for foster care placement
of the minor prior to January 1, 1998, the assessment shall also
consider, but need not be limited to, all of the factors specified in
subdivision (a) of Section 361.3.
   (5) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, the duration and character of the
relationship, the motivation for seeking adoption or guardianship,
and a statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption
or guardianship, unless the child's age or physical, emotional, or
other condition precludes his or her meaningful response, and if so,
a description of the condition.
   (6) A description of efforts to be made to identify a prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, including, but not limited to,
child-specific recruitment and listing on an adoption exchange.
   (7) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.
   (j) If, at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a
guardianship is established for the minor with a relative, and
juvenile court dependency is subsequently dismissed, the relative
shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP program or the Kin-GAP
Plus program, as provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section
11360) and Article 4.75 (commencing with Section 11380) of Chapter 2
of Part 3 of Division 9.
   (k) As used in this section, "relative" means an adult who is
related to the minor by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words "great,"
"great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of those persons even
if the                                                 marriage was
terminated by death or dissolution.
   (l) For purposes of this section, evidence of any of the following
circumstances may not, in and of itself, be deemed a failure to
provide or offer reasonable services:
   (1) The child has been placed with a foster family that is
eligible to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.

   (2) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.
   (3) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for the
child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.
   (m) The implementation and operation of the amendments to
subdivisions (c) and (g) enacted at the 2005-06 Regular Session shall
be subject to appropriation through the budget process and by phase,
as provided in Section 366.35.
  SEC. 2.5.  Section 366.21 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, as
amended by Section 26 of Chapter 75 of the Statutes of 2006, is
amended to read:
   366.21.  (a) Every hearing conducted by the juvenile court
reviewing the status of a dependent child shall be placed on the
appearance calendar. The court shall advise all persons present at
the hearing of the date of the future hearing and of their right to
be present and represented by counsel.
   (b) Except as provided in Sections 294 and 295, notice of the
hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 293.
   (c) At least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing, the social
worker shall file a supplemental report with the court regarding the
services provided or offered to the parent or legal guardian to
enable him or her to assume custody and the efforts made to achieve
legal permanence for the child if efforts to reunify fail, including,
but not limited to, efforts to maintain relationships between a
child who is 10 years of age or older and has been in out-of-home
placement for six months or longer and individuals who are important
to the child, consistent with the child's best interests; the
progress made; and, where relevant, the prognosis for return of the
child to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian;
and shall make his or her recommendation for disposition. If the
child is a member of a sibling group described in paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, the report and recommendation may
also take into account those factors described in subdivision (e)
relating to the child's sibling group. If the recommendation is not
to return the child to a parent or legal guardian, the report shall
specify why the return of the child would be detrimental to the
child. The social worker shall provide the parent or legal guardian,
counsel for the child, and any court-appointed child advocate with a
copy of the report, including his or her recommendation for
disposition, at least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing. In the
case of a child removed from the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian, the social worker shall, at least 10
calendar days prior to the hearing, provide a summary of his or her
recommendation for disposition to any foster parents, relative
caregivers, and certified foster parents who have been approved for
adoption by the State Department of Social Services when it is acting
as an adoption agency in counties that are not served by a county
adoption agency or by a licensed county adoption agency, community
care facility, or foster family agency having the physical custody of
the child. The social worker shall include a copy of the Judicial
Council Caregiver Information Form (JV-290) with the summary of
recommendations to the child's foster parents, relative caregivers,
or foster parents approved for adoption, in the caregiver's primary
language when available, along with information on how to file the
form with the court.
   (d) Prior to any hearing involving a child in the physical custody
of a community care facility or a foster family agency that may
result in the return of the child to the physical custody of his or
her parent or legal guardian, or in adoption or the creation of a
legal guardianship, the facility or agency shall file with the court
a report, or a Judicial Council Caregiver Information Form (JV-290),
containing its recommendation for disposition. Prior to the hearing
involving a child in the physical custody of a foster parent, a
relative caregiver, or a certified foster parent who has been
approved for adoption by the State Department of Social Services when
it is acting as an adoption agency or by a licensed adoption agency,
the foster parent, relative caregiver, or the certified foster
parent who has been approved for adoption by the State Department of
Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency in counties
that are not served by a county adoption agency or by a licensed
county adoption agency, may file with the court a report containing
his or her recommendation for disposition. The court shall consider
the report and recommendation filed pursuant to this subdivision
prior to determining any disposition.
   (e) At the review hearing held six months after the initial
dispositional hearing, the court shall order the return of the child
to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless
the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return
of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment. At the hearing, the court
shall consider the criminal history, obtained pursuant to paragraph
(1) of subdivision (f) of Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal
guardian subsequent to the child's removal, provided that he or she
agreed to submit fingerprint images to obtain criminal history
information as part of the case plan. The failure of the parent or
legal guardian to participate regularly and make substantive progress
in court-ordered treatment programs shall be prima facie evidence
that return would be detrimental. In making its determination, the
court shall review and consider the social worker's report and
recommendations and the report and recommendations of any child
advocate appointed pursuant to Section 356.5; and shall consider the
efforts or progress, or both, demonstrated by the parent or legal
guardian and the extent to which he or she availed himself or herself
to services provided.
   Whether or not the child is returned to a parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
conclusion that the return would be detrimental or would not be
detrimental. The court also shall make appropriate findings pursuant
to subdivision (a) of Section 366; and, where relevant, shall order
any additional services reasonably believed to facilitate the return
of the child to the custody of his or her parent or legal guardian.
The court shall also inform the parent or legal guardian that if the
child cannot be returned home by the 12-month permanency hearing, a
proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted. This section
does not apply in a case where, pursuant to Section 361.5, the court
has ordered that reunification services shall not be provided.
   If the child was under the age of three years on the date of the
initial removal, or is a member of a sibling group described in
paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, and the court
finds by clear and convincing evidence that the parent failed to
participate regularly and make substantive progress in a
court-ordered treatment plan, the court may schedule a hearing
pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. If, however, the court
finds there is a substantial probability that the child, who was
under the age of three years on the date of initial removal or is a
member of a sibling group described in paragraph (3) of subdivision
(a) of Section 361.5, may be returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian within six months or that reasonable services have not been
provided, the court shall continue the case to the 12-month
permanency hearing.
   For the purpose of placing and maintaining a sibling group
together in a permanent home, the court, in making its determination
to schedule a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 for some or all
members of a sibling group, as described in paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, shall review and consider the
social worker's report and recommendations. Factors the report shall
address, and the court shall consider, may include, but need not be
limited to, whether the sibling group was removed from parental care
as a group, the closeness and strength of the sibling bond, the ages
of the siblings, the appropriateness of maintaining the sibling group
together, the detriment to the child if sibling ties are not
maintained, the likelihood of finding a permanent home for the
sibling group, whether the sibling group is currently placed together
in a preadoptive home or has a concurrent plan goal of legal
permanency in the same home, the wishes of each child whose age and
physical and emotional condition permits a meaningful response, and
the best interest of each child in the sibling group. The court shall
specify the factual basis for its finding that it is in the best
interest of each child to schedule a hearing pursuant to Section
366.26 in 120 days for some or all of the members of the sibling
group.
   If the child was removed initially under subdivision (g) of
Section 300 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that
the whereabouts of the parent are still unknown, or the parent has
failed to contact and visit the child, the court may schedule a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. If the court
finds by clear and convincing evidence that the parent has been
convicted of a felony indicating parental unfitness, the court may
schedule a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days.
   If the child had been placed under court supervision with a
previously noncustodial parent pursuant to Section 361.2, the court
shall determine whether supervision is still necessary. The court may
terminate supervision and transfer permanent custody to that parent,
as provided for by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section
361.2.
   In all other cases, the court shall direct that any reunification
services previously ordered shall continue to be offered to the
parent or legal guardian pursuant to the time periods set forth in
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, provided that the court may modify
the terms and conditions of those services.
   If the child is not returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall determine whether reasonable services that
were designed to aid the parent or legal guardian in overcoming the
problems that led to the initial removal and the continued custody of
the child have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian. The court shall order that those services be initiated,
continued, or terminated.
   (f) The permanency hearing shall be held no later than 12 months
after the date the child entered foster care, as that date is
determined pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 361.5. At the
permanency hearing, the court shall determine the permanent plan for
the child, which shall include a determination of whether the child
will be returned to the child's home and, if so, when, within the
time limits of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5. The court shall
order the return of the child to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian unless the court finds, by a preponderance
of the evidence, that the return of the child to his or her parent or
legal guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to the
safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child.
The social worker shall have the burden of establishing that
detriment. At the permanency hearing, the court shall consider the
criminal history, obtained pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision
(f) of Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal guardian subsequent to
the child's removal, provided that he or she agreed to submit
fingerprint images to obtain criminal history information as part of
the case plan. The court shall also determine whether reasonable
services that were designed to aid the parent or legal guardian to
overcome the problems that led to the initial removal and continued
custody of the child have been provided or offered to the parent or
legal guardian. For each youth 16 years of age and older, the court
shall also determine whether services have been made available to
assist him or her in making the transition from foster care to
independent living. The failure of the parent or legal guardian to
participate regularly and make substantive progress in court-ordered
treatment programs shall be prima facie evidence that return would be
detrimental. In making its determination, the court shall review and
consider the social worker's report and recommendations and the
report and recommendations of any child advocate appointed pursuant
to Section 356.5, shall consider the efforts or progress, or both,
demonstrated by the parent or legal guardian and the extent to which
he or she availed himself or herself of services provided, and shall
make appropriate findings pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366.

   Whether or not the child is returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its
decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian,
the court shall specify the factual basis for its conclusion that
the return would be detrimental. The court also shall make a finding
pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366.
   (g) If the time period in which the court-ordered services were
provided has met or exceeded the time period set forth in paragraph
(1), (2), or (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, as appropriate,
and a child is not returned to the custody of a parent or legal
guardian at the permanency hearing held pursuant to subdivision (f),
the court shall do one of the following:
   (1) Continue the case for up to six months for a permanency review
hearing, provided that the hearing shall occur within 18 months of
the date the child was originally taken from the physical custody of
his or her parent or legal guardian. The court shall continue the
case only if it finds that there is a substantial probability that
the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the
extended period of time or that reasonable services have not been
provided to the parent or legal guardian.  For the purposes of this
section, in order to find a substantial probability that the child
will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent or
legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within the extended
period of time, the court shall be required to find all of the
following:
   (A) That the parent or legal guardian has consistently and
regularly contacted and visited with the child.
   (B) That the parent or legal guardian has made significant
progress in resolving problems that led to the child's removal from
the home.
   (C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity and
ability both to complete the objectives of his or her treatment plan
and to provide for the child's safety, protection, physical and
emotional well-being, and special needs.
   For purposes of this subdivision, the court's decision to continue
the case based on a finding or substantial probability that the
child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her parent
or legal guardian is a compelling reason for determining that a
hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not in the best interests
of the child.
   The court shall inform the parent or legal guardian that if the
child cannot be returned home by the next permanency review hearing,
a proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted. The court
may not order that a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 be held
unless there is clear and convincing evidence that reasonable
services have been provided or offered to the parent or legal
guardian.
   (2) Order that a hearing be held within 120 days, pursuant to
Section 366.26, but only if the court does not continue the case to
the permanency planning review hearing and there is clear and
convincing evidence that reasonable services have been provided or
offered to the parents or legal guardians.
   (3) Order that the child remain in long-term foster care, but only
if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence, based upon the
evidence already presented to it, including a recommendation by the
State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency in counties that are not served by a county adoption agency or
by a licensed county adoption agency, that there is a compelling
reason for determining that a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26
is not in the best interest of the child because the child is not a
proper subject for adoption and has no one willing to accept legal
guardianship. For purposes of this section, a recommendation by the
State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency in counties that are not served by a county adoption agency or
by a licensed county adoption agency that adoption is not in the
best interest of the child shall constitute a compelling reason for
the court's determination. That recommendation shall be based on the
present circumstances of the child and may not preclude a different
recommendation at a later date if the child's circumstances change.
   If the court orders that a child who is 10 years of age or older
remain in long-term foster care, the court shall determine whether
the agency has made reasonable efforts to maintain the child's
relationships with individuals other than the child's siblings who
are important to the child, consistent with the child's best
interests, and may make any appropriate order to ensure that those
relationships are maintained.
   (h) In any case in which the court orders that a hearing pursuant
to Section 366.26 shall be held, it shall also order the termination
of reunification services to the parent or legal guardian. The court
shall continue to permit the parent or legal guardian to visit the
child pending the hearing unless it finds that visitation would be
detrimental to the child. The court shall make any other appropriate
orders to enable the child to maintain relationships with
individuals, other than the child's siblings, who are important to
the child, consistent with the child's best interests.
   (i) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to Section
366.26 shall be held, it shall direct the agency supervising the
child and the licensed county adoption agency, or the State
Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency
in counties that are not served by a county adoption agency, to
prepare an assessment that shall include:
   (1) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents or
legal guardians.
   (2) A review of the amount of and nature of any contact between
the child and his or her parents or legal guardians and other members
of his or her extended family since the time of placement. Although
the extended family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case
basis, "extended family" for the purpose of this paragraph shall
include, but not be limited to, the child's siblings, grandparents,
aunts, and uncles.
   (3) An evaluation of the child's medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.
   (4) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment of
any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse or
neglect, the capability to meet the child's needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed guardian is a relative of
the minor, and the relative was assessed for foster care placement
of the minor prior to January 1, 1998, the assessment shall also
consider, but need not be limited to, all of the factors specified in
subdivision (a) of Section 361.3.
   (5) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, the duration and character of the
relationship, the motivation for seeking adoption or guardianship,
and a statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption
or guardianship, unless the child's age or physical, emotional, or
other condition precludes his or her meaningful response, and if so,
a description of the condition.
   (6) A description of efforts to be made to identify a prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, including, but not limited to,
child-specific recruitment and listing on an adoption exchange.
   (7) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.
   (j) If, at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a
guardianship is established for the minor with a relative, and
juvenile court dependency is subsequently dismissed, the relative
shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP program or the Kin-GAP
Plus program, as provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section
11360) and Article 4.75 (commencing with Section 11380) of Chapter 2
of Part 3 of Division 9.
   (k) As used in this section, "relative" means an adult who is
related to the minor by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words "great,"
"great-great," or "grand," or the spouse of any of those persons even
if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution.
   (l) For purposes of this section, evidence of any of the following
circumstances may not, in and of itself, be deemed a failure to
provide or offer reasonable services:
   (1) The child has been placed with a foster family that is
eligible to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.

   (2) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.
   (3) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for the
child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.
   (m) The implementation and operation of the amendments to
subdivisions (c) and (g) enacted at the 2005-06 Regular Session shall
be subject to appropriation through the budget process and by phase,
as provided in Section 366.35.
  SEC. 3.  If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this
act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local
agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant
to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of
the Government Code.

  SEC. 4.  (a) Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to
Section 295 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by this
bill and SB 678. It shall only become operative if (1) both bills are
enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2007, (2) each
bill amends Section 295 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and (3)
this bill is enacted after SB 678, in which case Section 295 of the
Welfare and Institutions Code, as amended by SB 678, shall remain
operative only until the operative date of this bill, at which time
Section 1.5 of this bill shall become operative, and Section 1 of
this bill shall not become operative.
   (b) Section 2.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section
366.21 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by this bill and
AB 1774. It shall only become operative if (1) both bills are
enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2007, (2) each
bill amends Section 366.21 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and
(3) this bill is enacted after AB 1774, in which case Section 366.21
of the Welfare and Institutions Code, as amended by AB 1774, shall
remain operative only until the operative date of this bill, at which
time Section 2.5 of this bill shall become operative, and Section 2
of this bill shall not become operative.