BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 26, 2006

               ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
                                 Gene Mullin, Chair
                  AB 2157 (Chu) - As Introduced:  February 21, 2006
           
          SUBJECT  :   Redevelopment:  El Monte

           SUMMARY  :   Allows the El Monte Redevelopment Agency to amend its  
          redevelopment plan for the purposes of a transit oriented  
          redevelopment project without making a finding of blight and  
          without complying with any existing law provisions (except  
          public notice requirements) with respect to amendments and time  
          extensions.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Allows the City of El Monte Redevelopment Agency (RA), for the  
            purposes of transit oriented redevelopment, to amend its  
            redevelopment plan according to the following:

             a)   Without a finding of blight;

             b)   Extend the life of the project area indefinitely;

             c)   Remove the time limit on incurring debt.

             d)   Increase from $44 million to $65 million the amount of  
               allowable bonded indebtedness for one or more transit  
               oriented redevelopment projects.

             e)   Increases to $150 million the amount of tax increment  
               allocated to the RA.

          2)Defines "transit oriented redevelopment project" as:

             a)   Located on land within the downtown El Monte  
               redevelopment project area.

             b)   The land is either owned or leased by the state, the  
               Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the City of El Monte  
               (City) or the RA.

             c)   Providing the following:

               i)     Public infrastructure;









                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  2

               ii)    Relocation of a fire station;

               iii)   Construction of a new public parking structure;

               iv)    Acquisition of new public park lands;

               v)     Public street improvements on Santa Anita Avenue;

               vi)    Public mass transit bus and rail facilities; or

               vii)   Private development activity by agreement with the  
                 City or the Redevelopment Agency.

          3)Alters the "pass through agreements" (if El Monte exercises  
            the authority granted to it by 
            AB 2157) for each affected taxing entity except for the County  
            of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Flood Control District, and  
            the Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire Protection District.

          4)Provides that the El Monte Redevelopment Agency must follow  
            the procedural (notice and hearing) requirements as provided  
            by SB 211 (Torlakson), Chapter 741, Statutes of 2001.  

          5)Provides findings and declarations describing the parcels to  
            be affected by the redevelopment plan described by this bill.

          6)Declares that this redevelopment project to be sited on  
            publicly owned lands in Downtown El Monte near the El Monte  
            Busway Terminal, that does not require acquisition of private  
            land or displacement of private business or residence,  
            presents a unique opportunity for the San Gabriel Valley and  
            the state to realize the goals of blight elimination and  
            transit oriented development.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Allows, with respect to redevelopment plans adopted prior to  
            January 1, 1994, agencies to repeal the time limit for  
            incurring indebtedness and to extend time limits for  
            redevelopment plan expiration and for receiving tax increment  
            revenues, for purposes of repaying debt used to improve areas  
            of substantial blight, for up to 10 additional years if  
            specified conditions are met (Health and Safety Code  
            33333.6).









                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  3

          2)Establishes that the conditions for obtaining the extensions  
            allowed by 1) above include:

             a)   A finding by the agency that significant blight remains  
               and cannot be eliminated without an extension.

             b)   A housing element in compliance with state law.

             c)   Increasing from 20% to 30% the tax increment revenue  
               earmarked to provide low and moderate income housing.

             d)   Complying with a specified process involving public  
               notice and hearings, and submitting a report justifying the  
               time extension to each local affected taxing entity, the  
               Department of Finance (DOF), and the Department of Housing  
               and Community Development (HCD).
            (Health and Safety Code 33333.10)

          3)Requires the agency hold public hearings prior to adopting an  
            amendment 
            (Health and Safety Code 33333.11).

          4)Authorizes the Attorney General to participate in the  
            extension process 
            (Health and Safety Code 33333.11).

          5)Authorizes the Attorney General to bring a civil action to  
            determine the validity of the proposed extension (Health and  
            Safety Code 33333.11).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown, but given the increased amount of tax  
          increment to be transferred to the El Monte Redevelopment Agency  
          the state general fund would likely be required to increase  
          transfers back to the County of Los Angeles in order to  
          reimburse public education costs.

           COMMENTS  :   

          According to the findings and declarations in AB 2157, the El  
          Monte Busway Terminal is located in the City of El Monte and is  
          one of the largest public mass transportation facilities for bus  
          commuters in the state.  The El Monte Busway connects the El  
          Monte Busway Terminal in the City of El Monte to the Los Angeles  
          Union Passenger Terminal in the City of Los Angeles.  The El  
          Monte Busway Terminal is situated on lands owned by the State of  








                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  4

          California.  The El Monte Busway Terminal is adjacent to other  
          lands that are owned by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan  
          Transportation Authority and the City of El Monte.

          In 1986 the State of California, the Southern California Rapid  
          Transit District, and the RA entered into a memorandum of  
          understanding to study potential mixed use public mass transit  
          oriented development proposals focused on the lands surrounding  
          the El Monte Busway Terminal.  When the City of El Monte adopted  
          the redevelopment plan for the Downtown El Monte Redevelopment  
          Project in 1987, one of the stated redevelopment programs  
          identified in the redevelopment plan was to provide for transit  
          oriented development in the vicinity of the Busway Terminal.

          According to the stated declarations in AB 2157 , the  
          demonstrable public benefit of providing for transit oriented  
          development in the vicinity of the El Monte Busway Terminal on  
          lands currently owned by public agencies, including the City of  
          El Monte, consisting of a mix of housing types, retail and  
          office professional uses oriented to the El Monte Busway  
          Terminal, and other civic uses including public park lands, is  
          being carefully studied by the City of El Monte in consultation  
          with other responsible public agencies, including the Department  
          of Transportation and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan  
          Transportation Authority.

           Arguments in Support  

          According to the author, AB 2157 amends the California Community  
          Redevelopment Law to provide flexibility for the City of El  
          Monte and its redevelopment agency to plan and implement a  
          transit oriented development that will provide new jobs and  
          housing. 

          Under existing law, the El Monte Redevelopment Agency (RDA) may  
          only incur debt to eliminate blight and finance specific  
          redevelopment projects during the first 20 years following the  
          adoption of a redevelopment plan (no later than July 14, 2007).   
          Also, the existing redevelopment plan provides for a maximum of  
          $44 million for bonded indebtedness.  

          According to the author, recently, the RDA and the City of El  
          Monte, in consultation with the California Department of  
          Transportation (Caltrans) and the Metropolitan Transportation  
          Authority (MTA), have begun a cooperative process that may lead  








                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  5

          to a specific plan for a regional, mixed-use, transit oriented  
          development project.  The concept could include commercial,  
          residential, and regional recreational uses.  Such a project  
          would take advantage of the existing heavily used El Monte bus  
          terminal, and make efficient, urban, and economic use of  
          contiguous lands presently owned by the City, Caltrans and MTA.   


          A considerable amount of time will be required to complete the  
          planning and study process, including environmental review, for  
          such a project.  According to the author, it is also likely that  
          no public financing for major parts of the new infrastructure in  
          support of such a project could be accomplished before the  
          current July 2007 deadline for incurring debt.

          The author asserts that AB 2157 would allow the RDA and the City  
          to amend the existing redevelopment plan to: 1) eliminate the  
          deadline for incurring debt; 2) create a new debt ceiling of $65  
          million; 3) allow the RA to receive tax increment generated  
          within the transit oriented development to be used toward  
          project costs and new debt service costs specifically for the  
          transit oriented development without extending the time limit  
          for the effectiveness of the Plan.  

          According to the author, AB 2157 would maintain the existing  
          pass-through agreement with affected taxing agencies which  
          provides for flexibility in development of new financing  
          arrangements for the Specific Plan area and the Transit Village  
          project.  During the life of the Plan, affected taxing entities  
          such as the school districts will receive significant benefits  
          in the form of new tax increment pass-through revenues from the  
          Specific Plan area if the Transit Village project (or portions  
          thereof) does in fact proceed, because significant portions of  
          the Specific Plan area are currently owned by public agencies  
          and therefore produce no property tax revenue. The development  
          of publicly-owned lands in the Project Area and within the  
          Specific Plan area presents an opportunity to achieve the goals  
          of the Transit Village Development Planning Act without  
          displacement or relocation of any private business or residence.  
           

           Arguments in Opposition  

          AB 2157 would allow the El Monte RDA, without a finding of  
          blight, to amend one of its redevelopment plans to carry out  








                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  6

          transit-oriented projects over an undetermined period of time.   
          This bill moves in the opposite direction from pending reform  
          legislation, seeking to place tighter restrictions on  
          redevelopment activities.

          In 2001 the Legislature approved SB 211 (Torlakson), the result  
          of more than a year's negotiation, to allow extensions of  
          redevelopment activity.  According to opponents, SB 211 achieved  
          a balanced and fair mechanism among the parties.  If SB 211  
          requires additional work, opponents have offered to discuss  
          changes to existing law so long as it applies to all  
          redevelopment agencies.  

          According to the County of Los Angeles, AB 2157 would weaken  
          current law by creating an exception to the deadline on  
          incurring debt, and an exception to the lifetime dollar limit on  
          the amount of tax increment that may be diverted to  
          redevelopment from essential countywide services.  As a result,  
          taxing entities within Los Angeles County would continue to lose  
          property tax increment funds that belong to the County and to  
          affected taxing entities once redevelopment projects are  
          completed.

          The County of Los Angeles asserts that it has sought  
          negotiations with El Monte and has indicated a willingness to  
          come to some compromise however no such compromise has been  
          reached at this point.  

          In the wake of the  Kelo v. New London, Conn  . decision, and the  
          widespread public outcry that followed, the Legislature is  
          currently working on a number of redevelopment reforms that  
          would apply to extensions, amendments and mergers.  Those bills  
          seek to tighten rather than loosen requirements on redevelopment  
          agencies.  AB 2157 does the reverse.  

           Staff Comments  

          The committee may wish to consider whether the policy suggested  
          in this bill is consistent with the more cautious approach the  
          Legislature seems to be taking with respect to allowing  
          expansion of redevelopment agency activity.  This committee  
          participated in several joint hearings in 2005 where witnesses  
          testified, indicating instances where redevelopment activity had  
          expanded beyond the original intent of the Redevelopment Act.   
          This bill deletes the requirement that a finding of blight be  








                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  7

          made by the agency, justifying the redevelopment project.  The  
          committee may wish to consider whether that is good policy,  
          after the U.S. Supreme Court's controversial decision last year  
          in  Kelo.  

          The committee may wish to inquire as to why existing law  
          provisions (under SB 211) which allow redevelopment agencies to  
          extend the period to incur debt for, up to, an additional 10  
          years upon a determination that blight exists, is not sufficient  
          in El Monte's case.  It would seem that possibly it is to avoid  
          the required blight finding.  

          The committee may wish to take notice that both in the stated  
          declarations of the bill and the author's statement of need for  
          the bill, references are vague as to the outcome of the process  
          of negotiation with the parties to the proposed transit oriented  
          development.  The bill language states that the "demonstrable  
          public benefit  . . . is being carefully studied by the City of  
          El Monte and (others) . . . ."  The author notes that "(the  
          parties) have begun a cooperative process that may lead to a  
          specific plan for a regional, mixed use, transit oriented  
          development project." The committee may wish to consider whether  
          it is sound public policy to make an exception to existing law  
          relating to blight findings, debt limits and deadlines when it  
          is not clear to what the parties will agree.  The committee may  
          wish to require that the parties present a plan to the  
          Legislature with specific and articulated reasons why an  
          exception should be made.  Is the rationale in this instance too  
          speculative?  

          The Legislature spent nearly two years studying and negotiating  
          changes to the time limitations on redevelopment plans.  In 2001  
          that process resulted in SB 211 by Senator Torlakson.  The  
          California Redevelopment Association, which represents the  
          interests of all redevelopment agencies in the state, helped  
          craft a balanced approach to address the needs of redevelopment  
          agencies statewide.  The committee may wish to consider whether  
          carving out piecemeal exceptions to existing law, without clear  
          articulation as to why such is necessary, is a sound approach to  
          policy. 

           Similar Legislation  

          AB 1167 (Chu) a very similar bill was introduced in 2005.  That  
          bill would have, in addition to the provisions in AB 2157,  








                                                                  AB 2157
                                                                  Page  8

          allowed the RDA to extend the time limit on the effectiveness of  
          the redevelopment plan for up to 10 years.  The author has not  
          included that provision in AB 2157; also AB 2157 maintains some  
          of the existing pass-through agreements.   

          AB 1167 was referred to the Assembly Committee on Housing and  
          Community Development as well as the Assembly Committee on Local  
          Government.  Hearings were cancelled at the request of the  
          author.  AB 1167 died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the  
          Constitution.
           
           Double referred  :  The Assembly Committee on Rules referred AB  
          2157 to Housing and Community Development Committee and Local  
          Government Committee.  If AB 2157 passes this committee, the  
          bill must be referred to the Assembly Committee on Local  
          Government.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          City of El Monte (Sponsor)

           Opposition 
           
          County of Los Angeles
          Western Center on Law and Poverty
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Hubert Bower / H. & C.D. / (916)  
          319-2085